{"id":33263,"date":"2015-04-30T14:00:39","date_gmt":"2015-04-30T14:00:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/\/2015\/04\/30\/nulidade-de-sentenca-factos-discussao-audiencia-de-julgamento\/"},"modified":"2015-04-30T14:00:39","modified_gmt":"2015-04-30T14:00:39","slug":"nulidade-de-sentenca-factos-discussao-audiencia-de-julgamento","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/nulidade-de-sentenca-factos-discussao-audiencia-de-julgamento\/","title":{"rendered":"Nulidade de senten\u00e7a. Factos. Discuss\u00e3o. Audi\u00eancia de julgamento"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p id=\"pvc_stats_33263\" class=\"pvc_stats all  \" data-element-id=\"33263\" style=\"\"><i class=\"pvc-stats-icon small\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" data-prefix=\"far\" data-icon=\"chart-bar\" role=\"img\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox=\"0 0 512 512\" class=\"svg-inline--fa fa-chart-bar fa-w-16 fa-2x\"><path fill=\"currentColor\" d=\"M396.8 352h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V108.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v230.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm-192 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V140.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v198.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm96 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V204.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v134.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zM496 400H48V80c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16H16C7.16 64 0 71.16 0 80v336c0 17.67 14.33 32 32 32h464c8.84 0 16-7.16 16-16v-16c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16zm-387.2-48h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8v-70.4c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v70.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8z\" class=\"\"><\/path><\/svg><\/i> <img src=\"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-content\/plugins\/page-views-count\/ajax-loader.gif\" border=0 \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \t<strong>NULIDADE DE SENTEN\u00c7A. FACTOS. DISCUSS\u00c3O. AUDI\u00caNCIA DE JULGAMENTO<br \/> \tRECURSO CRIMINAL N\u00ba <\/strong>70\/11.6GCSEI.C1<br \/> \t<strong>Relator:<\/strong> MARIA PILAR DE OLIVEIRA<br \/> \t<strong>Data do Acord\u00e3o: <\/strong>22-04-2015<br \/> \t<strong>Tribunal:<\/strong> GUARDA (INST\u00c2NCIA CENTRAL CRIMINAL &#8211; J2)<br \/> \t<strong>Legisla\u00e7\u00e3o:<\/strong> ARTS. 374.\u00ba, N.\u00ba 2, E 379.\u00ba, N.\u00ba 2, DO CPP<br \/> \t<strong>Sum\u00e1rio: <\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \t\tPadece da nulidade prevista no artigo 379.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 1, al. a), derivada da inobserv\u00e2ncia do disposto no artigo 379.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 2, ambas as normas referidas do CPP, a senten\u00e7a que n\u00e3o descreve, como provados ou n\u00e3o provados, os factos decorrentes da discuss\u00e3o da causa em audi\u00eancia de julgamento.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \t\tA refer\u00eancia a tais factos na motiva\u00e7\u00e3o da decis\u00e3o final n\u00e3o pode considerar-se como suficiente, porquanto os motivos de convic\u00e7\u00e3o do julgador se destinam a justificar porque decidiu o tribunal em determinado sentido, o que pressup\u00f5e a fixa\u00e7\u00e3o e descri\u00e7\u00e3o pr\u00e9via da dita factualidade.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \t<a href=\"http:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jtrc.nsf\/8fe0e606d8f56b22802576c0005637dc\/ece9ee15596f0ccd80257e37003c2784?OpenDocument\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Consultar texto integral<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p id=\"pvc_stats_33263\" class=\"pvc_stats all  \" data-element-id=\"33263\" style=\"\"><i class=\"pvc-stats-icon small\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" data-prefix=\"far\" data-icon=\"chart-bar\" role=\"img\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox=\"0 0 512 512\" class=\"svg-inline--fa fa-chart-bar fa-w-16 fa-2x\"><path fill=\"currentColor\" d=\"M396.8 352h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V108.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v230.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm-192 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V140.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v198.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm96 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V204.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v134.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zM496 400H48V80c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16H16C7.16 64 0 71.16 0 80v336c0 17.67 14.33 32 32 32h464c8.84 0 16-7.16 16-16v-16c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16zm-387.2-48h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8v-70.4c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v70.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8z\" class=\"\"><\/path><\/svg><\/i> <img src=\"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-content\/plugins\/page-views-count\/ajax-loader.gif\" border=0 \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p>NULIDADE DE SENTEN\u00c7A. FACTOS. DISCUSS\u00c3O. AUDI\u00caNCIA DE JULGAMENTO RECURSO CRIMINAL N\u00ba 70\/11.6GCSEI.C1 Relator: MARIA PILAR DE OLIVEIRA Data do Acord\u00e3o:<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":37,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[232],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33263"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/37"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33263"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33263\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33263"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33263"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33263"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}