{"id":32236,"date":"2014-05-19T11:00:04","date_gmt":"2014-05-19T11:00:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/\/2014\/05\/19\/caso-julgado-accao-de-reivindicacao-accao-de-demarcacao\/"},"modified":"2014-05-19T11:00:04","modified_gmt":"2014-05-19T11:00:04","slug":"caso-julgado-accao-de-reivindicacao-accao-de-demarcacao","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/caso-julgado-accao-de-reivindicacao-accao-de-demarcacao\/","title":{"rendered":"Caso julgado. Ac\u00e7\u00e3o de reivindica\u00e7\u00e3o. Ac\u00e7\u00e3o de demarca\u00e7\u00e3o"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p id=\"pvc_stats_32236\" class=\"pvc_stats all  \" data-element-id=\"32236\" style=\"\"><i class=\"pvc-stats-icon small\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" data-prefix=\"far\" data-icon=\"chart-bar\" role=\"img\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox=\"0 0 512 512\" class=\"svg-inline--fa fa-chart-bar fa-w-16 fa-2x\"><path fill=\"currentColor\" d=\"M396.8 352h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V108.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v230.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm-192 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V140.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v198.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm96 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V204.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v134.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zM496 400H48V80c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16H16C7.16 64 0 71.16 0 80v336c0 17.67 14.33 32 32 32h464c8.84 0 16-7.16 16-16v-16c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16zm-387.2-48h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8v-70.4c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v70.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8z\" class=\"\"><\/path><\/svg><\/i> <img src=\"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-content\/plugins\/page-views-count\/ajax-loader.gif\" border=0 \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \t<strong>CASO JULGADO. AC\u00c7\u00c3O DE REIVINDICA\u00c7\u00c3O. AC\u00c7\u00c3O DE DEMARCA\u00c7\u00c3O<br \/> \tAPELA\u00c7\u00c3O N\u00ba<\/strong> 289\/12.2TBMGL.C1<br \/> \t<strong>Relatora: <\/strong>S\u00cdLVIA PIRES<br \/> \t<strong>Data do Acord\u00e3o:<\/strong> 29-04-2014<br \/> \t<strong>Tribunal: <\/strong>TRIBUNAL JUDICIAL DE MANGUALDE \u2013 2\u00ba JU\u00cdZO<br \/> \t<strong>Legisla\u00e7\u00e3o:<\/strong> ART\u00ba 577\u00ba, I) E 619\u00ba DO NOVO C. P.C.<br \/> \t<strong>Sum\u00e1rio: <\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \t\tO caso julgado visa garantir, fundamentalmente, o valor da seguran\u00e7a jur\u00ed\u00addica, fundando-se a protec\u00e7\u00e3o a essa seguran\u00e7a jur\u00eddica, relativamente a actos jurisdicionais, no princ\u00edpio do Estado de Direito, pelo que se trata de um valor constitucionalmente protegido \u2013 art.\u00ba 2.\u00ba da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o \u2013, destinando-se a evitar que no exerc\u00edcio da fun\u00e7\u00e3o jurisdicional, duplicando-se as decis\u00f5es sobre id\u00eantico objecto processual, se contrarie na decis\u00e3o posterior o sentido da decis\u00e3o anterior.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \t\tOs limites do caso julgado material t\u00eam a ver com a propositura de uma ac\u00e7\u00e3o id\u00eantica a outra quanto aos sujeitos, ao pedido e \u00e0 causa de pedir, em termos da decis\u00e3o da segunda implicar o risco de o tribunal contradizer ou reproduzir a decis\u00e3o da primeira \u2013 art.\u00ba 580\u00ba, n.\u00ba 1 e 2, e 581\u00ba, n.\u00ba 1, do Novo C. P. Civil (reproduzem os art.\u00ba 498\u00ba, n.\u00ba 1 e 2, e 499\u00ba, n.\u00ba 1, do C. P. Civil de 1961).<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \t\tA doutrina e a jurisprud\u00eancia sempre procuraram diferenciar as ac\u00e7\u00f5es de reivindica\u00e7\u00e3o das ac\u00e7\u00f5es de demarca\u00e7\u00e3o, encontrando diversos crit\u00e9rios distintivos, revelando-se esclarecedora a express\u00e3o de que na ac\u00e7\u00e3o de reivindica\u00e7\u00e3o h\u00e1 um conflito acerca do t\u00edtulo, enquanto na demarca\u00e7\u00e3o h\u00e1 um conflito entre pr\u00e9dios, o que significa que a ac\u00e7\u00e3o de reivindi\u00adca\u00e7\u00e3o ser\u00e1 a adequada quando a quest\u00e3o respeite \u00e0 titularidade de um pr\u00e9dio, e a de demarca\u00e7\u00e3o quando a quest\u00e3o respeite, j\u00e1 n\u00e3o \u00e0 titularidade, mas \u00e0 extens\u00e3o do pr\u00e9dio.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \t\tTendo presente esta distin\u00e7\u00e3o, a jurisprud\u00eancia tem, maioritariamente, sustentado que n\u00e3o \u00e9 impeditiva da propositura de uma ac\u00e7\u00e3o de demarca\u00e7\u00e3o entre dois pr\u00e9dios a decis\u00e3o anterior de uma ac\u00e7\u00e3o de reivindica\u00e7\u00e3o proposta pelo pro\u00adpriet\u00e1rio de um desses pr\u00e9dios contra o propriet\u00e1rio confinante, relativa a uma faixa de terreno situada na zona de confronta\u00e7\u00e3o dos pr\u00e9dios.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \t<a href=\"http:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jtrc.nsf\/8fe0e606d8f56b22802576c0005637dc\/5b154a801bc11a5f80257cdd003a2552?OpenDocument\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Consultar texto integral<br \/> \t<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p id=\"pvc_stats_32236\" class=\"pvc_stats all  \" data-element-id=\"32236\" style=\"\"><i class=\"pvc-stats-icon small\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" data-prefix=\"far\" data-icon=\"chart-bar\" role=\"img\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox=\"0 0 512 512\" class=\"svg-inline--fa fa-chart-bar fa-w-16 fa-2x\"><path fill=\"currentColor\" d=\"M396.8 352h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V108.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v230.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm-192 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V140.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v198.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm96 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V204.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v134.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zM496 400H48V80c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16H16C7.16 64 0 71.16 0 80v336c0 17.67 14.33 32 32 32h464c8.84 0 16-7.16 16-16v-16c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16zm-387.2-48h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8v-70.4c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v70.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8z\" class=\"\"><\/path><\/svg><\/i> <img src=\"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-content\/plugins\/page-views-count\/ajax-loader.gif\" border=0 \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p>CASO JULGADO. AC\u00c7\u00c3O DE REIVINDICA\u00c7\u00c3O. AC\u00c7\u00c3O DE DEMARCA\u00c7\u00c3O APELA\u00c7\u00c3O N\u00ba 289\/12.2TBMGL.C1 Relatora: S\u00cdLVIA PIRES Data do Acord\u00e3o: 29-04-2014 Tribunal: TRIBUNAL<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":37,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[230],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32236"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/37"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32236"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32236\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32236"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32236"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32236"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}