{"id":31660,"date":"2014-01-31T09:58:30","date_gmt":"2014-01-31T09:58:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/\/2014\/01\/31\/reformatio-in-pejus-proibicao-reenvio-novo-julgamento-abuso-de-confianca-contra-a-seguranca-social-suspensao-da-execucao-da-pena-juizo-de-prognose-condicao-nulidade-de-sentenca\/"},"modified":"2014-01-31T09:58:30","modified_gmt":"2014-01-31T09:58:30","slug":"reformatio-in-pejus-proibicao-reenvio-novo-julgamento-abuso-de-confianca-contra-a-seguranca-social-suspensao-da-execucao-da-pena-juizo-de-prognose-condicao-nulidade-de-sentenca","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/reformatio-in-pejus-proibicao-reenvio-novo-julgamento-abuso-de-confianca-contra-a-seguranca-social-suspensao-da-execucao-da-pena-juizo-de-prognose-condicao-nulidade-de-sentenca\/","title":{"rendered":"Reformatio in pejus. Proibi\u00e7\u00e3o. Reenvio. Novo julgamento. Abuso de confian\u00e7a contra a seguran\u00e7a social. Suspens\u00e3o da execu\u00e7\u00e3o da pena. Ju\u00edzo de prognose, condi\u00e7\u00e3o. Nulidade de senten\u00e7a"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p id=\"pvc_stats_31660\" class=\"pvc_stats all  \" data-element-id=\"31660\" style=\"\"><i class=\"pvc-stats-icon small\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" data-prefix=\"far\" data-icon=\"chart-bar\" role=\"img\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox=\"0 0 512 512\" class=\"svg-inline--fa fa-chart-bar fa-w-16 fa-2x\"><path fill=\"currentColor\" d=\"M396.8 352h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V108.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v230.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm-192 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V140.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v198.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm96 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V204.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v134.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zM496 400H48V80c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16H16C7.16 64 0 71.16 0 80v336c0 17.67 14.33 32 32 32h464c8.84 0 16-7.16 16-16v-16c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16zm-387.2-48h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8v-70.4c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v70.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8z\" class=\"\"><\/path><\/svg><\/i> <img src=\"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-content\/plugins\/page-views-count\/ajax-loader.gif\" border=0 \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \t<strong>REFORMATIO IN PEJUS. PROIBI\u00c7\u00c3O. REENVIO. NOVO JULGAMENTO. ABUSO DE CONFIAN\u00c7A CONTRA A SEGURAN\u00c7A SOCIAL. SUSPENS\u00c3O DA EXECU\u00c7\u00c3O DA PENA. JU\u00cdZO DE PROGNOSE . CONDI\u00c7\u00c3O. NULIDADE DE SENTEN\u00c7A <\/strong><br \/> \t<strong>RECURSO CRIMINAL N\u00ba <\/strong>37\/10.1TAACB.C2<br \/> \t<strong>Relator: <\/strong>MARIA PILAR DE OLIVEIRA<br \/> \t<strong>Data do Acord\u00e3o:<\/strong> 22-01-2014<br \/> \t<strong>Tribunal: <\/strong>TRIBUNAL JUDICIAL DE ALCOBA\u00c7A (3.\u00ba JU\u00cdZO)<br \/> \t<strong>Legisla\u00e7\u00e3o: <\/strong>ARTIGOS 409.\u00ba, 426.\u00ba E 379.\u00ba, N.\u00ba 1, AL\u00cdNEA C), DO CPP; ARTIGOS 14.\u00ba, N.\u00ba 1, 105.\u00ba E 107.\u00ba, DO RGIT<br \/> \t<strong>Sum\u00e1rio: <\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \t\tN\u00e3o existe viola\u00e7\u00e3o do princ\u00edpio da proibi\u00e7\u00e3o de reformatio in pejus, previsto no n.\u00ba 1 do artigo 409.\u00ba do CPP, quando na primeira senten\u00e7a o tribunal da 1.\u00aa inst\u00e2ncia optou pela aplica\u00e7\u00e3o de pena de multa, e na segunda senten\u00e7a, elaborada por for\u00e7a de reenvio (parcial, circunscrito ao apuramento das condi\u00e7\u00f5es pessoais, econ\u00f3micas e sociais do arguido) determinado pelo tribunal da rela\u00e7\u00e3o, na sequ\u00eancia de recurso interposto pelo Minist\u00e9rio P\u00fablico, visando o agravamento da pena, imp\u00f4s pena de pris\u00e3o, declarada suspensa na sua execu\u00e7\u00e3o, mediante o dever de o condenado proceder ao pagamento, em certo prazo, ao Instituto de Gest\u00e3o Financeira do Instituto da Solidariedade e Seguran\u00e7a Social, determinado valor monet\u00e1rio.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \t\tSe, no \u00e2mbito de processo relativo a crime de abuso de confian\u00e7a contra a seguran\u00e7a social, o tribunal de 1.\u00aa inst\u00e2ncia apenas refere, na fundamenta\u00e7\u00e3o de direito da decis\u00e3o final, os rendimentos, dados como provados, auferidos pelo arguido, e, singelamente, decreta a suspens\u00e3o da execu\u00e7\u00e3o da pena, condicionada nos moldes definidos no artigo 14.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 1, do RGIT, n\u00e3o se mostra efectuado o ju\u00edzo de prognose de razoabilidade acerca da satisfa\u00e7\u00e3o dessa condi\u00e7\u00e3o legal, e, consequentemente, a senten\u00e7a proferida \u00e9 nula, por omiss\u00e3o de pron\u00fancia, nos termos do Ac. de Fixa\u00e7\u00e3o de Jurisprud\u00eancia n.\u00ba 8\/2012, de 12-09-2012 e do artigo 379.\u00ba, n.\u00ba 1, al\u00ednea c), do CPP.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"> \t<a href=\"http:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jtrc.nsf\/8fe0e606d8f56b22802576c0005637dc\/cd533cdf60eb928a80257c6e003c7904?OpenDocument\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Consultar texto integral<br \/> \t<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p id=\"pvc_stats_31660\" class=\"pvc_stats all  \" data-element-id=\"31660\" style=\"\"><i class=\"pvc-stats-icon small\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" data-prefix=\"far\" data-icon=\"chart-bar\" role=\"img\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox=\"0 0 512 512\" class=\"svg-inline--fa fa-chart-bar fa-w-16 fa-2x\"><path fill=\"currentColor\" d=\"M396.8 352h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V108.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v230.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm-192 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V140.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v198.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm96 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V204.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v134.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zM496 400H48V80c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16H16C7.16 64 0 71.16 0 80v336c0 17.67 14.33 32 32 32h464c8.84 0 16-7.16 16-16v-16c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16zm-387.2-48h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8v-70.4c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v70.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8z\" class=\"\"><\/path><\/svg><\/i> <img src=\"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-content\/plugins\/page-views-count\/ajax-loader.gif\" border=0 \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p>REFORMATIO IN PEJUS. PROIBI\u00c7\u00c3O. REENVIO. NOVO JULGAMENTO. ABUSO DE CONFIAN\u00c7A CONTRA A SEGURAN\u00c7A SOCIAL. SUSPENS\u00c3O DA EXECU\u00c7\u00c3O DA PENA. JU\u00cdZO<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":37,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[232],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31660"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/37"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31660"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31660\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31660"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31660"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31660"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}