{"id":29354,"date":"2008-06-10T19:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-10T19:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/\/2008\/06\/10\/movimento-judicial-ordinario-julho-2008-sp-32398\/"},"modified":"2008-06-10T19:00:00","modified_gmt":"2008-06-10T19:00:00","slug":"movimento-judicial-ordinario-julho-2008-sp-32398","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/movimento-judicial-ordinario-julho-2008-sp-32398\/","title":{"rendered":"Contra-ordena\u00e7\u00e3o. Constitucionalidade. Direito de defesa"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p id=\"pvc_stats_29354\" class=\"pvc_stats all  \" data-element-id=\"29354\" style=\"\"><i class=\"pvc-stats-icon small\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" data-prefix=\"far\" data-icon=\"chart-bar\" role=\"img\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox=\"0 0 512 512\" class=\"svg-inline--fa fa-chart-bar fa-w-16 fa-2x\"><path fill=\"currentColor\" d=\"M396.8 352h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V108.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v230.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm-192 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V140.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v198.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm96 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V204.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v134.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zM496 400H48V80c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16H16C7.16 64 0 71.16 0 80v336c0 17.67 14.33 32 32 32h464c8.84 0 16-7.16 16-16v-16c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16zm-387.2-48h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8v-70.4c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v70.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8z\" class=\"\"><\/path><\/svg><\/i> <img src=\"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-content\/plugins\/page-views-count\/ajax-loader.gif\" border=0 \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p> <strong>\tCONSTITUCIONALIDADE DO ART\u00ba 173\u00ba DO CE; CONTRA-ORDENA\u00c7\u00c3O; DIREITO DE DEFESA; ELEMENTO SUBJECTIVO<\/strong> <br \/> <strong>RECURSO PENAL N.\u00ba<\/strong>184\/07.7TBMIR.C1\t <br \/> <strong>Relator:<\/strong>\tDR. ESTEVES MARQUES <br \/> <strong>Data do Acord\u00e3o:<\/strong>\t11-06-2008 <br \/> <strong>Tribunal Recurso<\/strong>:\tCOMARCA DE MIRA <br \/> <strong>Legisla\u00e7\u00e3o Nacional:<\/strong>\tARTIGOS 172\u00ba, 173\u00ba CE, 50\u00ba DO RGCC<br \/> <strong> Sum\u00e1rio:<\/strong>\t <\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">\n<ol>\n<li>N\u00e3o \u00e9 inconstitucional o art\u00ba 173\u00ba do C\u00f3digo da Estrada quando permite ao infractor que for notificado pessoalmente e na hora pelo agente da autoridade a possibilidade de prestar cau\u00e7\u00e3o\/dep\u00f3sito , e retirar essa possibilidade \u00e0quele que \u00e9 notificado posteriormente, por se considerar que o pagamento de qualquer quantia \u00e9 feita a t\u00edtulo de cumprimento volunt\u00e1rio.  \t<\/li>\n<li>\u00a0N\u00e3o h\u00e1 viola\u00e7\u00e3o do direito de audi\u00e7\u00e3o e defesa do arguido consagrado no art\u00ba 50\u00ba do RGCC quando a imputa\u00e7\u00e3o que lhe foi transmitida se refere apenas aos factos objectivos da infrac\u00e7\u00e3o, nada referindo quanto ao elemento subjectivo.<\/li>\n<\/ol><\/div>\n<p> \t\u00a0 \t<\/p>\n<p> \t<a href=\"http:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jtrc.nsf\/c3fb530030ea1c61802568d9005cd5bb\/8beabd7c741977c88025747a004b7ce3?OpenDocument\" target=\"\u02cdblank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Consultar texto integral<\/a> \u00a0 \t<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p id=\"pvc_stats_29354\" class=\"pvc_stats all  \" data-element-id=\"29354\" style=\"\"><i class=\"pvc-stats-icon small\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" data-prefix=\"far\" data-icon=\"chart-bar\" role=\"img\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox=\"0 0 512 512\" class=\"svg-inline--fa fa-chart-bar fa-w-16 fa-2x\"><path fill=\"currentColor\" d=\"M396.8 352h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V108.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v230.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm-192 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V140.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v198.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm96 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V204.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v134.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zM496 400H48V80c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16H16C7.16 64 0 71.16 0 80v336c0 17.67 14.33 32 32 32h464c8.84 0 16-7.16 16-16v-16c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16zm-387.2-48h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8v-70.4c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v70.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8z\" class=\"\"><\/path><\/svg><\/i> <img src=\"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-content\/plugins\/page-views-count\/ajax-loader.gif\" border=0 \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p>CONSTITUCIONALIDADE DO ART\u00ba 173\u00ba DO CE; CONTRA-ORDENA\u00c7\u00c3O; DIREITO DE DEFESA; ELEMENTO SUBJECTIVO RECURSO PENAL N.\u00ba184\/07.7TBMIR.C1 Relator: DR. ESTEVES MARQUES Data<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[232],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29354"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29354"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29354\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29354"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29354"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29354"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}