{"id":28967,"date":"2010-11-03T11:49:12","date_gmt":"2010-11-03T11:49:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/\/2010\/11\/03\/recpen2770505tascdc2\/"},"modified":"2010-11-03T11:49:12","modified_gmt":"2010-11-03T11:49:12","slug":"recpen2770505tascdc2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/recpen2770505tascdc2\/","title":{"rendered":"Justo impedimento. Pressupostos. Reenvio para novo julgamento. Tribunal competente"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p id=\"pvc_stats_28967\" class=\"pvc_stats all  \" data-element-id=\"28967\" style=\"\"><i class=\"pvc-stats-icon small\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" data-prefix=\"far\" data-icon=\"chart-bar\" role=\"img\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox=\"0 0 512 512\" class=\"svg-inline--fa fa-chart-bar fa-w-16 fa-2x\"><path fill=\"currentColor\" d=\"M396.8 352h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V108.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v230.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm-192 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V140.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v198.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm96 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V204.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v134.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zM496 400H48V80c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16H16C7.16 64 0 71.16 0 80v336c0 17.67 14.33 32 32 32h464c8.84 0 16-7.16 16-16v-16c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16zm-387.2-48h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8v-70.4c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v70.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8z\" class=\"\"><\/path><\/svg><\/i> <img src=\"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-content\/plugins\/page-views-count\/ajax-loader.gif\" border=0 \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>JUSTO IMPEDIMENTO. PRESSUPOSTOS. REENVIO PARA NOVO JULGAMENTO. TRIBUNAL COMPETENTE<br \/> RECURSO PENAL&nbsp; N&ordm; <\/strong>277\/05.05TASCD.C2 <br \/> <strong>Relator: <\/strong>BR\u00cdZIDA MARTINS <br \/> <strong>Data do Acord\u00e3o: <\/strong>03-11-2010 <br \/> <strong>Tribunal:<\/strong> COMARCA DE SANTA COMBA D\u00c3O <br \/> <strong>Legisla\u00e7\u00e3o: <\/strong>ARTIGOS:145&ordm;E 146&ordm; DO CPC E 4&ordm;, 426&ordm;-A DO CPP <br \/> <strong>Sum\u00e1rio: <\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">N\u00e3o tendo sido alegado que o mandat\u00e1rio, defensor do arguido, tivesse estado, durante o per\u00edodo alegado, ininterruptamente impossibilitado de comunicar, quer com o mandante, quer com qualquer outro colega no qual pudesse substabelecer o mandato para a pr\u00e1tica do acto omitido, n\u00e3o se verifica uma situa\u00e7\u00e3o de justo impedimento.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">O novo julgamento, em consequ\u00eancia de reenvio, compete ao tribunal que efectuou o julgamento anterior, isto sem preju\u00edzo do disposto no art.&ordm; 40.&ordm;, al.&ordf; c), do CPP. Ou seja, o juiz que participou no primeiro julgamento fica impedido de participar no segundo.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Havendo dois ju\u00edzos na comarca, o segundo julgamento, determinado pelo reenvio, compete ao ju\u00edzo n\u00e3o recorrido.\n<p>     &nbsp;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jtrc.nsf\/8fe0e606d8f56b22802576c0005637dc\/3ebba97e47a7e886802577ee003fec85?OpenDocument\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Consultar texto integral<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p id=\"pvc_stats_28967\" class=\"pvc_stats all  \" data-element-id=\"28967\" style=\"\"><i class=\"pvc-stats-icon small\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" data-prefix=\"far\" data-icon=\"chart-bar\" role=\"img\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox=\"0 0 512 512\" class=\"svg-inline--fa fa-chart-bar fa-w-16 fa-2x\"><path fill=\"currentColor\" d=\"M396.8 352h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V108.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v230.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm-192 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V140.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v198.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm96 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V204.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v134.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zM496 400H48V80c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16H16C7.16 64 0 71.16 0 80v336c0 17.67 14.33 32 32 32h464c8.84 0 16-7.16 16-16v-16c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16zm-387.2-48h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8v-70.4c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v70.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8z\" class=\"\"><\/path><\/svg><\/i> <img src=\"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-content\/plugins\/page-views-count\/ajax-loader.gif\" border=0 \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p>JUSTO IMPEDIMENTO. PRESSUPOSTOS. REENVIO PARA NOVO JULGAMENTO. TRIBUNAL COMPETENTE RECURSO PENAL&nbsp; N&ordm; 277\/05.05TASCD.C2 Relator: BR\u00cdZIDA MARTINS Data do Acord\u00e3o: 03-11-2010<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[232],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28967"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28967"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28967\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28967"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28967"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28967"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}