{"id":28687,"date":"2013-06-21T14:22:43","date_gmt":"2013-06-21T14:22:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/\/2013\/06\/21\/recpen233127gdandc1\/"},"modified":"2013-06-21T14:22:43","modified_gmt":"2013-06-21T14:22:43","slug":"recpen233127gdandc1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/recpen233127gdandc1\/","title":{"rendered":"Processo sum\u00e1rio. Fundamento de facto. Remiss\u00e3o. Declara\u00e7\u00f5es do arguido. Nulidade de senten\u00e7a"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p id=\"pvc_stats_28687\" class=\"pvc_stats all  \" data-element-id=\"28687\" style=\"\"><i class=\"pvc-stats-icon small\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" data-prefix=\"far\" data-icon=\"chart-bar\" role=\"img\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox=\"0 0 512 512\" class=\"svg-inline--fa fa-chart-bar fa-w-16 fa-2x\"><path fill=\"currentColor\" d=\"M396.8 352h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V108.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v230.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm-192 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V140.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v198.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm96 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V204.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v134.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zM496 400H48V80c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16H16C7.16 64 0 71.16 0 80v336c0 17.67 14.33 32 32 32h464c8.84 0 16-7.16 16-16v-16c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16zm-387.2-48h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8v-70.4c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v70.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8z\" class=\"\"><\/path><\/svg><\/i> <img src=\"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-content\/plugins\/page-views-count\/ajax-loader.gif\" border=0 \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>PROCESSO SUM\u00c1RIO. FUNDAMENTO DE FACTO. REMISS\u00c3O. DECLARA\u00c7\u00d5ES DO ARGUIDO. NULIDADE DE SENTEN\u00c7A <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>RECURSO CRIMINAL N&ordm;<\/strong> 233\/12.7GDAND.C1 <br \/> <strong>Relator:<\/strong> JORGE JACOB <br \/> <strong>Data do Acord\u00e3o: <\/strong>05-06-2013 <br \/> <strong>Tribunal:<\/strong> JU\u00cdZO DE INST\u00c2NCIA CRIMINAL DO TRIBUNAL JUDICIAL DE ANADIA <br \/> <strong>Legisla\u00e7\u00e3o: <\/strong>ARTIGOS 389.&ordm;-A, N.&ordm; 1, AL\u00cdNEA A) E 379.&ordm;, N.&ordm; 1, DO CPP <br \/> <strong>Sum\u00e1rio<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Ainda que no \u00e2mbito de processo sum\u00e1rio, a lei n\u00e3o permite que a mat\u00e9ria de facto, mesmo relativa \u00e0s condi\u00e7\u00f5es pessoais do arguido, seja considerada provada por remiss\u00e3o para as declara\u00e7\u00f5es daquele ou de qualquer outra pessoa interveniente no julgamento.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">A viola\u00e7\u00e3o dos ditames legais no referido contexto, ou seja, o dever de fixa\u00e7\u00e3o precisa e objectiva da mat\u00e9ria de facto, determina a nulidade da senten\u00e7a, nos termos do artigo 379.&ordm;, n.&ordm; 1, al\u00ednea a), do CPP, por omiss\u00e3o (parcial) das men\u00e7\u00f5es referidas na al. a) do n.&ordm; 1 do artigo 389.&ordm;-A do mesmo diploma.\n<p>     <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jtrc.nsf\/8fe0e606d8f56b22802576c0005637dc\/614b975394c8fb4780257b910048a6ab?OpenDocument\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Consultar texto integral<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p id=\"pvc_stats_28687\" class=\"pvc_stats all  \" data-element-id=\"28687\" style=\"\"><i class=\"pvc-stats-icon small\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" data-prefix=\"far\" data-icon=\"chart-bar\" role=\"img\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox=\"0 0 512 512\" class=\"svg-inline--fa fa-chart-bar fa-w-16 fa-2x\"><path fill=\"currentColor\" d=\"M396.8 352h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V108.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v230.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm-192 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V140.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v198.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm96 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V204.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v134.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zM496 400H48V80c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16H16C7.16 64 0 71.16 0 80v336c0 17.67 14.33 32 32 32h464c8.84 0 16-7.16 16-16v-16c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16zm-387.2-48h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8v-70.4c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v70.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8z\" class=\"\"><\/path><\/svg><\/i> <img src=\"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-content\/plugins\/page-views-count\/ajax-loader.gif\" border=0 \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p>PROCESSO SUM\u00c1RIO. FUNDAMENTO DE FACTO. REMISS\u00c3O. DECLARA\u00c7\u00d5ES DO ARGUIDO. NULIDADE DE SENTEN\u00c7A RECURSO CRIMINAL N&ordm; 233\/12.7GDAND.C1 Relator: JORGE JACOB Data<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":37,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[232],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28687"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/37"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28687"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28687\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28687"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28687"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28687"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}