{"id":28016,"date":"2013-02-14T15:19:09","date_gmt":"2013-02-14T15:19:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/\/2013\/02\/14\/recpen96110tagrdc1\/"},"modified":"2013-02-14T15:19:09","modified_gmt":"2013-02-14T15:19:09","slug":"recpen96110tagrdc1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/recpen96110tagrdc1\/","title":{"rendered":"Liberdade de express\u00e3o. Contenda pol\u00edtica. Difama\u00e7\u00e3o atrav\u00e9s de meio de comunica\u00e7\u00e3o social. Causa de justifica\u00e7\u00e3o"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p id=\"pvc_stats_28016\" class=\"pvc_stats all  \" data-element-id=\"28016\" style=\"\"><i class=\"pvc-stats-icon small\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" data-prefix=\"far\" data-icon=\"chart-bar\" role=\"img\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox=\"0 0 512 512\" class=\"svg-inline--fa fa-chart-bar fa-w-16 fa-2x\"><path fill=\"currentColor\" d=\"M396.8 352h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V108.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v230.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm-192 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V140.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v198.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm96 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V204.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v134.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zM496 400H48V80c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16H16C7.16 64 0 71.16 0 80v336c0 17.67 14.33 32 32 32h464c8.84 0 16-7.16 16-16v-16c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16zm-387.2-48h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8v-70.4c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v70.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8z\" class=\"\"><\/path><\/svg><\/i> <img src=\"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-content\/plugins\/page-views-count\/ajax-loader.gif\" border=0 \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>LIBERDADE DE EXPRESS\u00c3O. CONTENDA POL\u00cdTICA. DIFAMA\u00c7\u00c3O ATRAV\u00c9S DE MEIO DE COMUNICA\u00c7\u00c3O SOCIAL. CAUSA DE JUSTIFICA\u00c7\u00c3O <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>RECURSO CRIMINAL N&ordm; <\/strong>96\/11.0TAGRD.C1 <br \/> <strong>Relator: <\/strong>JORGE JACOB&nbsp; <br \/> <strong>Data do Acord\u00e3o:<\/strong> 19-12-2012 <br \/> <strong>Tribunal: <\/strong>COMARCA DA GUARDA &#8211; 1&ordm; JU\u00cdZO <br \/> <strong>Legisla\u00e7\u00e3o: <\/strong>ARTIGOS 180&deg;, N.&deg; 1, 183&deg;, N.&ordm; 2 E 31&ordm;, DO C. PENAL <br \/> <strong>Sum\u00e1rio: <\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Chamar a algu\u00e9m atrasado mental \u00e9 manifestamente ofensivo, para mais tratando-se de algu\u00e9m que exerce fun\u00e7\u00f5es p\u00fablicas para as quais foi democraticamente eleito.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Neste condicionalismo n\u00e3o funciona a causa de justifica\u00e7\u00e3o prevista na al. a), do n.&ordm; 2, do art.&ordm; 180&ordm;, do C\u00f3digo Penal, j\u00e1 que n\u00e3o est\u00e1 em causa uma imputa\u00e7\u00e3o de factos que visem a realiza\u00e7\u00e3o de um interesse leg\u00edtimo, mas uma formula\u00e7\u00e3o de ju\u00edzos de valor ofensivos.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Na impossibilidade de funcionamento da causa de justifica\u00e7\u00e3o do art.&ordm; 180&ordm;, n.&ordm; 2, do C\u00f3digo Penal, dada a inadmissibilidade da exceptio veritatis, dever\u00e3o funcionar as regras gerais constantes do art.&ordm; 31&ordm;, do mesmo Diploma, em cujos termos &ldquo;o facto n\u00e3o \u00e9 pun\u00edvel quando a sua ilicitude for exclu\u00edda pela ordem jur\u00eddica considerada na sua totalidade&rdquo;, nomeadamente, nos termos da al. b), do respectivo n.&ordm; 2, quando o facto for praticado &ldquo;no exerc\u00edcio de um direito&rdquo;, havendo, no entanto, que ter em especial aten\u00e7\u00e3o os princ\u00edpios da pondera\u00e7\u00e3o de interesses e\/ou da adequa\u00e7\u00e3o social.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Ainda que esta express\u00e3o tenha sido proferida no \u00e2mbito de uma contenda pol\u00edtica, a densidade dos direitos em quest\u00e3o n\u00e3o permite afirmar uma manifesta supremacia do direito do arguido de se pronunciar politicamente sobre os factos dessa contenda, sacrificando o direito ao bom-nome e reputa\u00e7\u00e3o do assistente, tanto mais que o arguido n\u00e3o carecia em absoluto da formula\u00e7\u00e3o do ju\u00edzo ofensivo para fazer valer o seu ponto de vista, raz\u00e3o pela qual n\u00e3o poder\u00e1 prevalecer-se da causa de justifica\u00e7\u00e3o. <br \/>     &nbsp;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jtrc.nsf\/8fe0e606d8f56b22802576c0005637dc\/c57a6cbdb949eefa80257b12005154ab?OpenDocument\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Consultar texto integral<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p id=\"pvc_stats_28016\" class=\"pvc_stats all  \" data-element-id=\"28016\" style=\"\"><i class=\"pvc-stats-icon small\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" data-prefix=\"far\" data-icon=\"chart-bar\" role=\"img\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox=\"0 0 512 512\" class=\"svg-inline--fa fa-chart-bar fa-w-16 fa-2x\"><path fill=\"currentColor\" d=\"M396.8 352h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V108.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v230.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm-192 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V140.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v198.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm96 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V204.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v134.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zM496 400H48V80c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16H16C7.16 64 0 71.16 0 80v336c0 17.67 14.33 32 32 32h464c8.84 0 16-7.16 16-16v-16c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16zm-387.2-48h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8v-70.4c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v70.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8z\" class=\"\"><\/path><\/svg><\/i> <img src=\"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-content\/plugins\/page-views-count\/ajax-loader.gif\" border=0 \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p>LIBERDADE DE EXPRESS\u00c3O. CONTENDA POL\u00cdTICA. DIFAMA\u00c7\u00c3O ATRAV\u00c9S DE MEIO DE COMUNICA\u00c7\u00c3O SOCIAL. CAUSA DE JUSTIFICA\u00c7\u00c3O RECURSO CRIMINAL N&ordm; 96\/11.0TAGRD.C1 Relator:<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":37,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[231],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28016"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/37"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28016"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28016\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28016"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28016"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28016"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}