{"id":27973,"date":"2003-09-16T19:00:00","date_gmt":"2003-09-16T19:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/\/2003\/09\/16\/movimento-judicial-ordinario-julho-2008-sp-27494\/"},"modified":"2003-09-16T19:00:00","modified_gmt":"2003-09-16T19:00:00","slug":"movimento-judicial-ordinario-julho-2008-sp-27494","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/movimento-judicial-ordinario-julho-2008-sp-27494\/","title":{"rendered":"Leg\u00edtima Defesa"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p id=\"pvc_stats_27973\" class=\"pvc_stats all  \" data-element-id=\"27973\" style=\"\"><i class=\"pvc-stats-icon small\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" data-prefix=\"far\" data-icon=\"chart-bar\" role=\"img\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox=\"0 0 512 512\" class=\"svg-inline--fa fa-chart-bar fa-w-16 fa-2x\"><path fill=\"currentColor\" d=\"M396.8 352h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V108.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v230.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm-192 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V140.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v198.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm96 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V204.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v134.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zM496 400H48V80c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16H16C7.16 64 0 71.16 0 80v336c0 17.67 14.33 32 32 32h464c8.84 0 16-7.16 16-16v-16c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16zm-387.2-48h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8v-70.4c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v70.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8z\" class=\"\"><\/path><\/svg><\/i> <img src=\"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-content\/plugins\/page-views-count\/ajax-loader.gif\" border=0 \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\"> <strong>LEG\u00cdTIMA DEFESA <br \/> RECURSO PENAL N\u00ba<\/strong> 2021\/03 <br \/> <strong>Relator<\/strong>: DR. OLIVEIRA MENDES <br \/> <strong>Data do Acord\u00e3o<\/strong>: 17-09-2003 <br \/> <strong>Tribunal de recurso<\/strong>: FIGUEIRA DA FOZ<br \/> <strong>Legisla\u00e7\u00e3o Nacional<\/strong>: ART.\u00ba S 31 \u00b0 E 32\u00b0, DO C\u00d3DIGO PENAL. <br \/> <strong>Sum\u00e1rio<\/strong>: <\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>\n<div align=\"justify\"> \tO ju\u00edzo sobre a adequa\u00e7\u00e3o do meio de defesa deve ter em considera\u00e7\u00e3o as circunst\u00e2ncias do caso concreto.  \t<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div align=\"justify\"> \tA lei actual apenas exige como requisito da leg\u00edtima defesa a consci\u00eancia da agress\u00e3o e a necessidade de defesa, pelo que se mostra desprovido de sentido falar-se em animus defendendi.  \t<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div align=\"justify\"> \tNo direito de leg\u00edtima defesa devem ser inclu\u00eddos a vida, a integridade f\u00edsica, a sa\u00fade, a liberdade, o domic\u00edlio e o patrim\u00f3nio e, excepcionalmente, perante agress\u00f5es repetidas e de extrema gravidade, todas os demais interesses juridicamente tutelados do agredido ou defendente.  \t<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div align=\"justify\"> \tContra agress\u00f5es insignificantes deve-se recusar a leg\u00edtima defesa.  \t<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p align=\"justify\"> \t<a href=\"http:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jtrc.nsf\/c3fb530030ea1c61802568d9005cd5bb\/0094876481edc29380256e01005ee7d5?OpenDocument\" target=\"\u02cdblank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Consultar texto integral<\/a> \t<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p id=\"pvc_stats_27973\" class=\"pvc_stats all  \" data-element-id=\"27973\" style=\"\"><i class=\"pvc-stats-icon small\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" data-prefix=\"far\" data-icon=\"chart-bar\" role=\"img\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox=\"0 0 512 512\" class=\"svg-inline--fa fa-chart-bar fa-w-16 fa-2x\"><path fill=\"currentColor\" d=\"M396.8 352h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V108.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v230.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm-192 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V140.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v198.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm96 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V204.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v134.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zM496 400H48V80c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16H16C7.16 64 0 71.16 0 80v336c0 17.67 14.33 32 32 32h464c8.84 0 16-7.16 16-16v-16c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16zm-387.2-48h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8v-70.4c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v70.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8z\" class=\"\"><\/path><\/svg><\/i> <img src=\"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-content\/plugins\/page-views-count\/ajax-loader.gif\" border=0 \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p>LEG\u00cdTIMA DEFESA RECURSO PENAL N\u00ba 2021\/03 Relator: DR. OLIVEIRA MENDES Data do Acord\u00e3o: 17-09-2003 Tribunal de recurso: FIGUEIRA DA FOZ<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[231],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27973"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27973"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27973\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27973"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27973"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27973"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}