{"id":26528,"date":"2004-10-18T19:00:00","date_gmt":"2004-10-18T19:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/\/2004\/10\/18\/movimento-judicial-ordinario-julho-2008-sp-19299\/"},"modified":"2004-10-18T19:00:00","modified_gmt":"2004-10-18T19:00:00","slug":"movimento-judicial-ordinario-julho-2008-sp-19299","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/movimento-judicial-ordinario-julho-2008-sp-19299\/","title":{"rendered":"Caso julgado: Inconstitucionalidade. Agravo"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

<\/path><\/svg><\/i> <\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

CASO JULGADO. INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE. AGRAVO
AGRAVO N\u00ba<\/strong> 1888\/04
Relator<\/strong>: DR. JAIME FERREIRA
Data do Acord\u00e3o<\/strong>: 19-10-2004\u00a0
Tribunal<\/strong>: M\u00caDA\u00a0
Legisla\u00e7\u00e3o<\/strong>: ART\u00baS 487\u00ba, N\u00ba 2 ; E 494\u00ba, AL. I), DO CPC
Sum\u00e1rio<\/strong>: <\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \n
    \tAt\u00e9 \u00e0 reforma de 1995 do CPC ( levada a cabo pelo DL n\u00ba 329-A\/95, de 12\/12 ) entendia-se que a figura jur\u00eddica do chamado \u201c caso julgado \u201c configurava uma excep\u00e7\u00e3o perempt\u00f3ria, conforme dispunha o ent\u00e3o art\u00ba 496\u00ba, al. a), do CPC . \t<\/div>\n<\/li>\n
  2. \n
    \tTal entendimento veio a ser modificado com a citada reforma, em consequ\u00eancia da qual a excep\u00e7\u00e3o do \u201c caso julgado \u201c passou a integrar expressamente as chamadas “excep\u00e7\u00f5es dilat\u00f3rias”, ao lado da litispend\u00eancia \u2013 a actual al. i) do art\u00ba 494\u00ba do CPC . \t<\/div>\n<\/li>\n
  3. \n
    \tN\u00e3o \u00e9 inconstitucional a actual redac\u00e7\u00e3o da al. i) do art\u00ba 494\u00ba do CPC . IV- A verifica\u00e7\u00e3o desse tipo de excep\u00e7\u00e3o d\u00e1 lugar \u00e0 absolvi\u00e7\u00e3o da inst\u00e2ncia, pelo que o recurso ordin\u00e1rio admiss\u00edvel a uma decis\u00e3o dessa natureza ser\u00e1 da esp\u00e9cie \u201cagravo \u201c. \t<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    \t\u00a0Consultar texto integral<\/a> \t<\/p>\n

    \t\u00a0 \t<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    <\/div>\n

    <\/path><\/svg><\/i> <\/p>\n

    <\/div>\n

    CASO JULGADO. INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE. AGRAVO AGRAVO N\u00ba 1888\/04 Relator: DR. JAIME FERREIRA Data do Acord\u00e3o: 19-10-2004\u00a0 Tribunal: M\u00caDA\u00a0 Legisla\u00e7\u00e3o: ART\u00baS 487\u00ba,<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[230],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26528"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26528"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26528\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26528"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26528"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26528"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}