{"id":26446,"date":"2005-05-10T19:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-05-10T19:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/\/2005\/05\/10\/movimento-judicial-ordinario-julho-2008-sp-18536\/"},"modified":"2005-05-10T19:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-05-10T19:00:00","slug":"movimento-judicial-ordinario-julho-2008-sp-18536","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/movimento-judicial-ordinario-julho-2008-sp-18536\/","title":{"rendered":"Aprecia\u00e7\u00e3o da prova. Prova indici\u00e1ria. Valor"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p id=\"pvc_stats_26446\" class=\"pvc_stats all  \" data-element-id=\"26446\" style=\"\"><i class=\"pvc-stats-icon small\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" data-prefix=\"far\" data-icon=\"chart-bar\" role=\"img\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox=\"0 0 512 512\" class=\"svg-inline--fa fa-chart-bar fa-w-16 fa-2x\"><path fill=\"currentColor\" d=\"M396.8 352h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V108.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v230.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm-192 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V140.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v198.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm96 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V204.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v134.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zM496 400H48V80c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16H16C7.16 64 0 71.16 0 80v336c0 17.67 14.33 32 32 32h464c8.84 0 16-7.16 16-16v-16c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16zm-387.2-48h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8v-70.4c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v70.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8z\" class=\"\"><\/path><\/svg><\/i> <img src=\"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-content\/plugins\/page-views-count\/ajax-loader.gif\" border=0 \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\"> <strong>APRECIA\u00c7\u00c3O DA PROVA. PROVA INDICI\u00c1RIA. VALOR <br \/> RECURSO PENAL N\u00ba<\/strong> 1056\/05 <br \/> <strong>Relator<\/strong>: DR. OLIVEIRA MENDES <br \/> <strong>Data do Acord\u00e3o<\/strong>: 11-05-2005<br \/> <strong>Tribunal<\/strong>: VOUZELA <br \/> <strong>Legisla\u00e7\u00e3o<\/strong>: ARTIGO 127\u00ba, DO C\u00d3DIGO DE PROCESSO PENAL <br \/> <strong>Sum\u00e1rio<\/strong>: <\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>\n<div align=\"justify\"> \tNa aus\u00eancia de prova directa nada impede que o tribunal deduza racionalmente a verdade dos factos a partir da prova indici\u00e1ria (prova artificial ou por concurso de circunst\u00e2ncias).  \t<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div align=\"justify\"> \tNo entanto, a prova indici\u00e1ria dever\u00e1 obedecer, em princ\u00edpio, aos seguintes requisitos: &#8211; Exist\u00eancia de uma pluralidade de dados indici\u00e1rios plenamente provados ou absolutamente cred\u00edveis; &#8211; Racionalidade da infer\u00eancia obtida, de maneia que o facto \u201cconsequ\u00eancia\u201d resulte de forma natural e l\u00f3gica dos factos-base, segundo um processo dedutivo, baseado na l\u00f3gica e nas regras da experi\u00eancia (recto crit\u00e9rio humano e correcto racioc\u00ednio).  \t<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p align=\"justify\"> \t<a href=\"http:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jtrc.nsf\/c3fb530030ea1c61802568d9005cd5bb\/98b6c4b3ab6f7b9a8025701400523a95?OpenDocument\" target=\"\u02cdblank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Consultar texto integral<\/a> \t<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p id=\"pvc_stats_26446\" class=\"pvc_stats all  \" data-element-id=\"26446\" style=\"\"><i class=\"pvc-stats-icon small\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" data-prefix=\"far\" data-icon=\"chart-bar\" role=\"img\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox=\"0 0 512 512\" class=\"svg-inline--fa fa-chart-bar fa-w-16 fa-2x\"><path fill=\"currentColor\" d=\"M396.8 352h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V108.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v230.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm-192 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V140.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v198.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm96 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V204.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v134.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zM496 400H48V80c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16H16C7.16 64 0 71.16 0 80v336c0 17.67 14.33 32 32 32h464c8.84 0 16-7.16 16-16v-16c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16zm-387.2-48h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8v-70.4c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v70.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8z\" class=\"\"><\/path><\/svg><\/i> <img src=\"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-content\/plugins\/page-views-count\/ajax-loader.gif\" border=0 \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p>APRECIA\u00c7\u00c3O DA PROVA. PROVA INDICI\u00c1RIA. VALOR RECURSO PENAL N\u00ba 1056\/05 Relator: DR. OLIVEIRA MENDES Data do Acord\u00e3o: 11-05-2005 Tribunal: VOUZELA<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[230],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26446"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26446"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26446\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26446"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26446"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26446"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}