{"id":25032,"date":"2011-11-08T15:55:47","date_gmt":"2011-11-08T15:55:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/\/2011\/11\/08\/ap355076tbofrc1\/"},"modified":"2011-11-08T15:55:47","modified_gmt":"2011-11-08T15:55:47","slug":"ap355076tbofrc1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/ap355076tbofrc1\/","title":{"rendered":"Baldios. Lei interpretativa. Ac\u00e7\u00e3o de impugna\u00e7\u00e3o de justifica\u00e7\u00e3o notarial. \u00d3nus da prova"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p id=\"pvc_stats_25032\" class=\"pvc_stats all  \" data-element-id=\"25032\" style=\"\"><i class=\"pvc-stats-icon small\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" data-prefix=\"far\" data-icon=\"chart-bar\" role=\"img\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox=\"0 0 512 512\" class=\"svg-inline--fa fa-chart-bar fa-w-16 fa-2x\"><path fill=\"currentColor\" d=\"M396.8 352h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V108.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v230.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm-192 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V140.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v198.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm96 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V204.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v134.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zM496 400H48V80c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16H16C7.16 64 0 71.16 0 80v336c0 17.67 14.33 32 32 32h464c8.84 0 16-7.16 16-16v-16c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16zm-387.2-48h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8v-70.4c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v70.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8z\" class=\"\"><\/path><\/svg><\/i> <img src=\"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-content\/plugins\/page-views-count\/ajax-loader.gif\" border=0 \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>BALDIOS. LEI INTERPRETATIVA. AC\u00c7\u00c3O DE IMPUGNA\u00c7\u00c3O DE JUSTIFICA\u00c7\u00c3O NOTARIAL. \u00d3NUS DA PROVA <br \/> APELA\u00c7\u00c3O N&ordm; <\/strong>355\/07.6TBOFR.C1 <br \/> <strong>Relator: <\/strong>TELES PEREIRA&nbsp;<br \/> <strong>Data do Acord\u00e3o:<\/strong> 08-11-2011 <br \/> <strong>Tribunal: <\/strong>TRIBUNAL JUDICIAL DE OLIVEIRA DE FRADES <br \/> <strong>Legisla\u00e7\u00e3o:<\/strong> LEI N&ordm; 68\/93, DE 4 DE SETEMBRO; ART&ordm; 8&ordm;, N&ordm; 1, E 116&ordm; DO C\u00d3DIGO DO REGISTO PREDIAL (CRPRED.), NA REDAC\u00c7\u00c3O DO DECRETO-LEI N&ordm; 116\/2008, DE 4 DE JULHO. <br \/> <strong>Sum\u00e1rio:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Face \u00e0 natureza inquestionavelmente processual do artigo 8&ordm; do C.R.Pred., deve entender-se que o seu novo conte\u00fado est\u00e1 sujeito ao princ\u00edpio da aplica\u00e7\u00e3o imediata pr\u00f3prio do direito adjectivo.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Independentemente dessa circunst\u00e2ncia, tendo a nova redac\u00e7\u00e3o introduzida no n&ordm; 1 do referido artigo 8&ordm; consagrado um entendimento que anteriormente j\u00e1 era afirmado pela jurisprud\u00eancia (correspondia mesmo \u00e0 orienta\u00e7\u00e3o dominante no STJ), deve ser atribu\u00edda a essa altera\u00e7\u00e3o a natureza de lei interpretativa, com a consequente aplica\u00e7\u00e3o imediata afirmada no n&ordm; 1 do artigo 13&ordm; do C\u00f3digo Civil.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Nos termos do artigo 4&ordm;, n&ordm; 1 da Lei dos Baldios (Lei n&ordm; 68\/93, de 4 de Setembro), &ldquo;os actos ou neg\u00f3cios jur\u00eddicos de apropria\u00e7\u00e3o ou apossamento, tendo por objecto terrenos baldios, bem como da sua posterior transmiss\u00e3o, s\u00e3o nulos, nos termos gerais de direito&rdquo;.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">O que normalmente se pretende com o modelo de ac\u00e7\u00e3o de impugna\u00e7\u00e3o de justifica\u00e7\u00f5es notariais \u00e9 a declara\u00e7\u00e3o de que o r\u00e9u n\u00e3o tem o direito que foi objecto da escritura de justifica\u00e7\u00e3o notarial.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">A ac\u00e7\u00e3o de impugna\u00e7\u00e3o de justifica\u00e7\u00e3o notarial \u00e9 uma ac\u00e7\u00e3o de simples aprecia\u00e7\u00e3o negativa, porque proposta para obten\u00e7\u00e3o da declara\u00e7\u00e3o de inexist\u00eancia dum direito (artigo 4&ordm;, n&ordm; 2, al\u00ednea a) do CPC). O que se pretende \u00e9 a declara\u00e7\u00e3o de que o justificante n\u00e3o \u00e9 o titular do direito justificado na escritura que vai servir de base ao registo de aquisi\u00e7\u00e3o, nos termos do artigo 116&ordm; do CRPred.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Esta natureza &ndash; de ac\u00e7\u00e3o de simples aprecia\u00e7\u00e3o negativa &ndash; convoca desde logo, enquanto regra espec\u00edfica de atribui\u00e7\u00e3o do \u00f3nus da prova, o artigo 343&ordm;, n&ordm; 1 do C\u00f3digo Civil. Assente que assim \u00e9, neste tipo de ac\u00e7\u00e3o compete ao r\u00e9u o \u00f3nus da prova do que subjaz \u00e0 escritura, com a correspondente regra de decis\u00e3o inerente \u00e0 indemonstra\u00e7\u00e3o da sua vers\u00e3o.\n<p>     <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jtrc.nsf\/c3fb530030ea1c61802568d9005cd5bb\/f81e28c4313a5ff480257950003d5428?OpenDocument\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Consultar texto integral<\/a><\/li>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p id=\"pvc_stats_25032\" class=\"pvc_stats all  \" data-element-id=\"25032\" style=\"\"><i class=\"pvc-stats-icon small\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" data-prefix=\"far\" data-icon=\"chart-bar\" role=\"img\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox=\"0 0 512 512\" class=\"svg-inline--fa fa-chart-bar fa-w-16 fa-2x\"><path fill=\"currentColor\" d=\"M396.8 352h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V108.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v230.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm-192 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V140.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v198.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm96 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V204.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v134.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zM496 400H48V80c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16H16C7.16 64 0 71.16 0 80v336c0 17.67 14.33 32 32 32h464c8.84 0 16-7.16 16-16v-16c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16zm-387.2-48h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8v-70.4c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v70.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8z\" class=\"\"><\/path><\/svg><\/i> <img src=\"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-content\/plugins\/page-views-count\/ajax-loader.gif\" border=0 \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p>BALDIOS. LEI INTERPRETATIVA. AC\u00c7\u00c3O DE IMPUGNA\u00c7\u00c3O DE JUSTIFICA\u00c7\u00c3O NOTARIAL. \u00d3NUS DA PROVA APELA\u00c7\u00c3O N&ordm; 355\/07.6TBOFR.C1 Relator: TELES PEREIRA&nbsp; Data do<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[229],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25032"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25032"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25032\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25032"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25032"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25032"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}