{"id":23766,"date":"2006-04-04T11:22:02","date_gmt":"2006-04-04T11:22:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/\/2006\/04\/04\/ag372205\/"},"modified":"2006-04-04T11:22:02","modified_gmt":"2006-04-04T11:22:02","slug":"ag372205","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/ag372205\/","title":{"rendered":"Cota processual. Seu valor adjectivo"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p id=\"pvc_stats_23766\" class=\"pvc_stats all  \" data-element-id=\"23766\" style=\"\"><i class=\"pvc-stats-icon small\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" data-prefix=\"far\" data-icon=\"chart-bar\" role=\"img\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox=\"0 0 512 512\" class=\"svg-inline--fa fa-chart-bar fa-w-16 fa-2x\"><path fill=\"currentColor\" d=\"M396.8 352h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V108.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v230.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm-192 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V140.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v198.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm96 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V204.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v134.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zM496 400H48V80c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16H16C7.16 64 0 71.16 0 80v336c0 17.67 14.33 32 32 32h464c8.84 0 16-7.16 16-16v-16c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16zm-387.2-48h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8v-70.4c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v70.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8z\" class=\"\"><\/path><\/svg><\/i> <img src=\"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-content\/plugins\/page-views-count\/ajax-loader.gif\" border=0 \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>COTA PROCESSUAL. SEU VALOR ADJECTIVO <br \/> AGRAVO&nbsp; N&ordm;<\/strong> 3722\/05 <br \/> <strong>Relator:<\/strong> SOUSA PINTO <br \/> <strong>Data do Acord\u00e3o<\/strong>: 04-04-2006 <br \/> <strong>Tribunal Recurso: <\/strong>TRIBUNAL JUDICIAL DE \u00c1GUEDA &#8211; 1&ordm; JU\u00cdZO <br \/> <strong>Legisla\u00e7\u00e3o Nacional: <\/strong>ART&ordm; 254&ordm;, N&ordm; 4; E 655&ordm; DO CPC . <br \/> <strong>Sum\u00e1rio:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">&nbsp;Uma &ldquo;cota&rdquo; num processo judicial n\u00e3o faz prova plena dos factos que nela se declaram, estando sujeita ao princ\u00edpio da livre aprecia\u00e7\u00e3o da prova, \u00ednsito no art&ordm; 655&ordm;, n&ordm; 1, do CPC .<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Por via deste princ\u00edpio, o julgador aprecia livremente as provas, decidindo segundo a sua convic\u00e7\u00e3o acerca de cada facto, s\u00f3 assim n\u00e3o sucedendo quando a lei exija, para a exist\u00eancia ou prova de qualquer facto jur\u00eddico, qualquer formalidade especial, a qual, nesse caso, n\u00e3o pode ser dispensada &ndash; art&ordm; 655&ordm;, n&ordm; 2, do CPC .<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Conforme constitui orienta\u00e7\u00e3o jurisprudencial prevalecente, o controle pela Rela\u00e7\u00e3o sobre a convic\u00e7\u00e3o alcan\u00e7ada pelo tribunal de 1&ordf; inst\u00e2ncia acerca de um dado facto deve restringir-se aos casos de flagrante desconformidade entre os elementos de prova e a decis\u00e3o proferida .\n<p>     <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jtrc.nsf\/c3fb530030ea1c61802568d9005cd5bb\/eff348c1731bbcfa80257168004cb203?OpenDocument\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Consultar texto integral<\/a><\/li>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p id=\"pvc_stats_23766\" class=\"pvc_stats all  \" data-element-id=\"23766\" style=\"\"><i class=\"pvc-stats-icon small\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" data-prefix=\"far\" data-icon=\"chart-bar\" role=\"img\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox=\"0 0 512 512\" class=\"svg-inline--fa fa-chart-bar fa-w-16 fa-2x\"><path fill=\"currentColor\" d=\"M396.8 352h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V108.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v230.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm-192 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V140.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v198.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zm96 0h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8V204.8c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v134.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8zM496 400H48V80c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16H16C7.16 64 0 71.16 0 80v336c0 17.67 14.33 32 32 32h464c8.84 0 16-7.16 16-16v-16c0-8.84-7.16-16-16-16zm-387.2-48h22.4c6.4 0 12.8-6.4 12.8-12.8v-70.4c0-6.4-6.4-12.8-12.8-12.8h-22.4c-6.4 0-12.8 6.4-12.8 12.8v70.4c0 6.4 6.4 12.8 12.8 12.8z\" class=\"\"><\/path><\/svg><\/i> <img src=\"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-content\/plugins\/page-views-count\/ajax-loader.gif\" border=0 \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p>COTA PROCESSUAL. SEU VALOR ADJECTIVO AGRAVO&nbsp; N&ordm; 3722\/05 Relator: SOUSA PINTO Data do Acord\u00e3o: 04-04-2006 Tribunal Recurso: TRIBUNAL JUDICIAL DE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[230],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23766"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23766"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23766\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23766"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23766"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trc.pt\/2020\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23766"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}